The search
for authentic meaning in life is dependent upon the individual’s freedom to
choose and to act and to do so responsibly. While this sounds simple, it is not.
Sartre and
Heidegger had very different theories of the degree of freedom individuals have
to choose and to act Sartre argued that individuals have great freedom while
Heidegger thought individuals are significantly constrained by their culture. Sartre claimed that existence preceded “essence”
while most philosophers state the reverse is true. Most
philosophers theorize that one is born with an “essence” i.e., a fundamental
set of properties that define the nature of the individual. Sartre believed that you create your own
essence through the choices you make and the consequent actions you take. He held
since “being” has no preordained meaning existence is a stage on which the
individual is totally free to create meaning.
Sartre believed that if the individual does not acknowledge and exercise
this responsibility she / he lives in “bad faith.”
Most people
will believe and insist that their choices are free even though they do not
accept the facts of existence. Many
people have the need for a compliant attachment to an authoritarian figure or
ideology and thus they have only an illusion of freedom. This subject will be
discussed in the next blog post.
The Rule-of-Thumb
should be to assume Sartre’s theory is correct so your search will be motivated
by optimism. By boldly claiming great freedom of action you are likely to realize
more even if you occasionally miss the mark.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home